# Arcane vs Bitfocus Companion

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Arcane | Bitfocus Companion |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 ✓ | 68/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 44 in Container Management | #10 of 104 in Home Automation |
| GitHub stars | 8 101 ✓ | 2 345 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +532 ✓ | +46 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 31 ✓ | 20 |
| Latest release | v2.17.1 · 25 Oct 2026 ✓ | v5.1.1 · 21 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | Other |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Arcane scores 76/100 against 68/100 for Bitfocus Companion, so it is the safer default.

Arcane ships more often: 31 stable releases in the past year, against 20 for Bitfocus Companion.

If you want the quickest setup, Arcane is easier to run; Bitfocus Companion needs more configuration.

Arcane is growing faster right now (+532 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Arcane](https://selfhost.directory/project/arcane) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/arcane.md)
- [Bitfocus Companion](https://selfhost.directory/project/bitfocus-companion) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/bitfocus-companion.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/arcane-vs-bitfocus-companion