ArcadeDBvsSurrealDB
Two self-hosted Neo4j alternatives, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| ArcadeDB | SurrealDB | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 59/100 | 78/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 3 in Graph Database | #5 of 38 in Databases |
| GitHub stars | 1 225 | 33 241 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +62 | +183 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 17 | 21 |
| Latest release | 26.10.2 · 15 Oct 2026 | v3.3.4 · 19 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Other |
| Main language | Java | Rust |
Which one should you pick?
SurrealDB scores 78/100 against 59/100 for ArcadeDB, so it is the safer default.
SurrealDB ships more often: 21 stable releases in the past year, against 17 for ArcadeDB.
If you want the quickest setup, SurrealDB is easier to run; ArcadeDB needs more configuration.
SurrealDB is growing faster right now (+183 stars in 30 days).
ArcadeDB details →SurrealDB details → All Neo4j alternatives →
Swap a project
Keep ArcadeDB, compare it with
Keep SurrealDB, compare it with