# ArcadeDB vs FalkorDB

> Two self-hosted [Neo4j alternatives](https://selfhost.directory/alternative-to/neo4j), compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | ArcadeDB | FalkorDB |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 59/100 | 64/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #3 of 3 in Graph Database | #1 of 3 in Graph Database |
| GitHub stars | 1 225 | 10 496 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +62 ✓ | +-5 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 17 ✓ | 12 |
| Latest release | 26.10.2 · 15 Oct 2026 | v4.22.3 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Other |
| Main language | Java | Rust |

## Which one should you pick?

FalkorDB scores 64/100 against 59/100 for ArcadeDB, so it is the safer default.

ArcadeDB ships more often: 17 stable releases in the past year, against 12 for FalkorDB.

If you want the quickest setup, FalkorDB is easier to run; ArcadeDB needs more configuration.

ArcadeDB is growing faster right now (+62 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [ArcadeDB](https://selfhost.directory/project/arcadedb) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/arcadedb.md)
- [FalkorDB](https://selfhost.directory/project/falkordb) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/falkordb.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/arcadedb-vs-falkordb