# Appwrite vs Workout.cool

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Appwrite | Workout.cool |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 84/100 ✓ | 66/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 15 in Backend as a Service | #2 of 11 in Fitness Tracker |
| GitHub stars | 57 787 ✓ | 8 650 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +335 ✓ | +155 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 17 ✓ | 1 |
| Latest release | 1.9.10 · 24 Oct 2026 ✓ | v1.3.2 · 7 Dec 2025 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Appwrite scores 84/100 against 66/100 for Workout.cool, so it is the safer default.

Appwrite ships more often: 17 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for Workout.cool.

If you want the quickest setup, Workout.cool is easier to run; Appwrite needs more configuration.

Appwrite is growing faster right now (+335 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Appwrite](https://selfhost.directory/project/appwrite) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/appwrite.md)
- [Workout.cool](https://selfhost.directory/project/workout-cool) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/workout-cool.md)

## Related comparisons

- [Appwrite vs coolify](https://selfhost.directory/compare/appwrite-vs-coolify)
- [Appwrite vs supabase](https://selfhost.directory/compare/appwrite-vs-supabase)
- [Appwrite vs dokploy](https://selfhost.directory/compare/appwrite-vs-dokploy)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/appwrite-vs-workout-cool