# Appwrite vs woodpecker-ci

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Appwrite | woodpecker-ci |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 84/100 ✓ | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 15 in Backend as a Service | #5 of 28 in CI/CD |
| GitHub stars | 57 786 ✓ | 8 065 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +334 ✓ | +157 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 17 ✓ | 11 |
| Latest release | 1.9.10 · 24 Oct 2026 | v3.20.0 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

Appwrite scores 84/100 against 73/100 for woodpecker-ci, so it is the safer default.

Appwrite ships more often: 17 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for woodpecker-ci.

Appwrite is growing faster right now (+334 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Appwrite](https://selfhost.directory/project/appwrite) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/appwrite.md)
- [woodpecker-ci](https://selfhost.directory/project/woodpecker-ci) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/woodpecker-ci.md)

## Related comparisons

- [Appwrite vs coolify](https://selfhost.directory/compare/appwrite-vs-coolify)
- [Appwrite vs supabase](https://selfhost.directory/compare/appwrite-vs-supabase)
- [Appwrite vs dokploy](https://selfhost.directory/compare/appwrite-vs-dokploy)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/appwrite-vs-woodpecker-ci