# Appwrite vs Warpgate

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Appwrite | Warpgate |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 84/100 ✓ | 75/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 15 in Backend as a Service | #11 of 78 in Security |
| GitHub stars | 57 788 ✓ | 8 159 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +336 ✓ | +199 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 17 | 33 ✓ |
| Latest release | 1.9.10 · 24 Oct 2026 | v0.30.2 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Rust |

## Which one should you pick?

Appwrite scores 84/100 against 75/100 for Warpgate, so it is the safer default.

Warpgate ships more often: 33 stable releases in the past year, against 17 for Appwrite.

If you want the quickest setup, Warpgate is easier to run; Appwrite needs more configuration.

## Details

- [Appwrite](https://selfhost.directory/project/appwrite) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/appwrite.md)
- [Warpgate](https://selfhost.directory/project/warpgate) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/warpgate.md)

## Related comparisons

- [Appwrite vs coolify](https://selfhost.directory/compare/appwrite-vs-coolify)
- [Appwrite vs supabase](https://selfhost.directory/compare/appwrite-vs-supabase)
- [Appwrite vs dokploy](https://selfhost.directory/compare/appwrite-vs-dokploy)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/appwrite-vs-warpgate