# Appwrite vs Umami

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Appwrite | Umami |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 84/100 | 85/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #1 of 15 in Backend as a Service | #1 of 21 in Web analytics |
| GitHub stars | 57 790 ✓ | 39 757 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +329 | +761 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 17 ✓ | 13 |
| Latest release | 1.9.10 · 24 Oct 2026 ✓ | v3.4.1 · 23 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Umami scores 85/100 against 84/100 for Appwrite, so it is the safer default.

Appwrite ships more often: 17 stable releases in the past year, against 13 for Umami.

If you want the quickest setup, Umami is easier to run; Appwrite needs more configuration.

Umami is growing faster right now (+761 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Appwrite](https://selfhost.directory/project/appwrite) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/appwrite.md)
- [Umami](https://selfhost.directory/project/umami) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/umami.md)

## Related comparisons

- [Appwrite vs coolify](https://selfhost.directory/compare/appwrite-vs-coolify)
- [Appwrite vs supabase](https://selfhost.directory/compare/appwrite-vs-supabase)
- [Appwrite vs dokploy](https://selfhost.directory/compare/appwrite-vs-dokploy)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/appwrite-vs-umami