# Appwrite vs TradingAgents

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Appwrite | TradingAgents |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 84/100 | 86/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #1 of 15 in Backend as a Service | #4 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 57 786 | 117 750 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +334 | +5 391 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 17 ✓ | 11 |
| Latest release | 1.9.10 · 24 Oct 2026 | v0.7.1 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

TradingAgents scores 86/100 against 84/100 for Appwrite, so it is the safer default.

Appwrite ships more often: 17 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for TradingAgents.

TradingAgents is growing faster right now (+5 391 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Appwrite](https://selfhost.directory/project/appwrite) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/appwrite.md)
- [TradingAgents](https://selfhost.directory/project/tradingagents) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tradingagents.md)

## Related comparisons

- [Appwrite vs coolify](https://selfhost.directory/compare/appwrite-vs-coolify)
- [Appwrite vs supabase](https://selfhost.directory/compare/appwrite-vs-supabase)
- [Appwrite vs dokploy](https://selfhost.directory/compare/appwrite-vs-dokploy)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/appwrite-vs-tradingagents