# Appwrite vs Pterodactyl

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Appwrite | Pterodactyl |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 84/100 ✓ | 75/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 15 in Backend as a Service | #4 of 62 in Game Servers |
| GitHub stars | 57 790 ✓ | 9 438 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +329 ✓ | +183 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 17 ✓ | 11 |
| Latest release | 1.9.10 · 24 Oct 2026 ✓ | v1.15.2 · 21 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | Other |
| Main language | Typescript | PHP |

## Which one should you pick?

Appwrite scores 84/100 against 75/100 for Pterodactyl, so it is the safer default.

Appwrite ships more often: 17 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for Pterodactyl.

If you want the quickest setup, Appwrite is easier to run; Pterodactyl needs more configuration.

## Details

- [Appwrite](https://selfhost.directory/project/appwrite) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/appwrite.md)
- [Pterodactyl](https://selfhost.directory/project/pterodactyl) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/pterodactyl.md)

## Related comparisons

- [Appwrite vs coolify](https://selfhost.directory/compare/appwrite-vs-coolify)
- [Appwrite vs supabase](https://selfhost.directory/compare/appwrite-vs-supabase)
- [Appwrite vs dokploy](https://selfhost.directory/compare/appwrite-vs-dokploy)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/appwrite-vs-pterodactyl