# Appwrite vs paymenter

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Appwrite | paymenter |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 84/100 ✓ | 68/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 15 in Backend as a Service | #3 of 13 in Billing |
| GitHub stars | 57 790 ✓ | 2 811 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +329 | +500 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 17 ✓ | 14 |
| Latest release | 1.9.10 · 24 Oct 2026 ✓ | v1.5.9 · 2 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | PHP |

## Which one should you pick?

Appwrite scores 84/100 against 68/100 for paymenter, so it is the safer default.

Appwrite ships more often: 17 stable releases in the past year, against 14 for paymenter.

## Details

- [Appwrite](https://selfhost.directory/project/appwrite) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/appwrite.md)
- [paymenter](https://selfhost.directory/project/paymenter) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/paymenter.md)

## Related comparisons

- [Appwrite vs coolify](https://selfhost.directory/compare/appwrite-vs-coolify)
- [Appwrite vs supabase](https://selfhost.directory/compare/appwrite-vs-supabase)
- [Appwrite vs dokploy](https://selfhost.directory/compare/appwrite-vs-dokploy)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/appwrite-vs-paymenter