# Appwrite vs OpenReader

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Appwrite | OpenReader |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 84/100 ✓ | 59/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 15 in Backend as a Service | #4 of 15 in Audiobook Management |
| GitHub stars | 57 786 ✓ | 550 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +334 ✓ | +35 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 17 | 19 ✓ |
| Latest release | 1.9.10 · 24 Oct 2026 | v5.4.0 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Appwrite scores 84/100 against 59/100 for OpenReader, so it is the safer default.

OpenReader ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 17 for Appwrite.

Appwrite is growing faster right now (+334 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Appwrite](https://selfhost.directory/project/appwrite) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/appwrite.md)
- [OpenReader](https://selfhost.directory/project/openreader) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/openreader.md)

## Related comparisons

- [Appwrite vs coolify](https://selfhost.directory/compare/appwrite-vs-coolify)
- [Appwrite vs supabase](https://selfhost.directory/compare/appwrite-vs-supabase)
- [Appwrite vs dokploy](https://selfhost.directory/compare/appwrite-vs-dokploy)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/appwrite-vs-openreader