# Appwrite vs n8n

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Appwrite | n8n |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 84/100 | 92/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #1 of 15 in Backend as a Service | #1 of 32 in Workflow Automation |
| GitHub stars | 57 790 | 208 928 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +338 | +3 119 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 17 | 205 ✓ |
| Latest release | 1.9.10 · 24 Oct 2026 | n8n@3.0.1 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | Other |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

n8n scores 92/100 against 84/100 for Appwrite, so it is the safer default.

n8n ships more often: 205 stable releases in the past year, against 17 for Appwrite.

n8n is growing faster right now (+3 119 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Appwrite](https://selfhost.directory/project/appwrite) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/appwrite.md)
- [n8n](https://selfhost.directory/project/n8n) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/n8n.md)

## Related comparisons

- [Appwrite vs coolify](https://selfhost.directory/compare/appwrite-vs-coolify)
- [Appwrite vs supabase](https://selfhost.directory/compare/appwrite-vs-supabase)
- [Appwrite vs dokploy](https://selfhost.directory/compare/appwrite-vs-dokploy)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/appwrite-vs-n8n