# Appwrite vs llama.cpp

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Appwrite | llama.cpp |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 84/100 | 93/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #1 of 15 in Backend as a Service | #2 of 25 in LLM Inference |
| GitHub stars | 57 788 | 132 663 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +336 | +3 306 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 17 | 1458 ✓ |
| Latest release | 1.9.10 · 24 Oct 2026 | b11969 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | C++ |

## Which one should you pick?

llama.cpp scores 93/100 against 84/100 for Appwrite, so it is the safer default.

llama.cpp ships more often: 1458 stable releases in the past year, against 17 for Appwrite.

llama.cpp is growing faster right now (+3 306 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Appwrite](https://selfhost.directory/project/appwrite) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/appwrite.md)
- [llama.cpp](https://selfhost.directory/project/llamacpp) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/llamacpp.md)

## Related comparisons

- [Appwrite vs coolify](https://selfhost.directory/compare/appwrite-vs-coolify)
- [Appwrite vs supabase](https://selfhost.directory/compare/appwrite-vs-supabase)
- [Appwrite vs dokploy](https://selfhost.directory/compare/appwrite-vs-dokploy)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/appwrite-vs-llamacpp