# Appwrite vs langflow

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Appwrite | langflow |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 84/100 | 90/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #1 of 15 in Backend as a Service | #2 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 57 788 | 156 117 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +336 | +926 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 17 | 20 ✓ |
| Latest release | 1.9.10 · 24 Oct 2026 ✓ | v1.12.8 · 21 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

langflow scores 90/100 against 84/100 for Appwrite, so it is the safer default.

langflow ships more often: 20 stable releases in the past year, against 17 for Appwrite.

langflow is growing faster right now (+926 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Appwrite](https://selfhost.directory/project/appwrite) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/appwrite.md)
- [langflow](https://selfhost.directory/project/langflow) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/langflow.md)

## Related comparisons

- [Appwrite vs coolify](https://selfhost.directory/compare/appwrite-vs-coolify)
- [Appwrite vs supabase](https://selfhost.directory/compare/appwrite-vs-supabase)
- [Appwrite vs dokploy](https://selfhost.directory/compare/appwrite-vs-dokploy)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/appwrite-vs-langflow