# Appwrite vs faynoSync

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Appwrite | faynoSync |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 84/100 ✓ | 48/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 15 in Backend as a Service | #7 of 20 in Application Management |
| GitHub stars | 57 788 ✓ | 158 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +336 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 17 | 21 ✓ |
| Latest release | 1.9.10 · 24 Oct 2026 ✓ | v2.8.0 · 14 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

Appwrite scores 84/100 against 48/100 for faynoSync, so it is the safer default.

faynoSync ships more often: 21 stable releases in the past year, against 17 for Appwrite.

Appwrite is growing faster right now (+336 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Appwrite](https://selfhost.directory/project/appwrite) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/appwrite.md)
- [faynoSync](https://selfhost.directory/project/faynosync) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/faynosync.md)

## Related comparisons

- [Appwrite vs coolify](https://selfhost.directory/compare/appwrite-vs-coolify)
- [Appwrite vs supabase](https://selfhost.directory/compare/appwrite-vs-supabase)
- [Appwrite vs dokploy](https://selfhost.directory/compare/appwrite-vs-dokploy)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/appwrite-vs-faynosync