# Appsmith vs Octoprint

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Appsmith | Octoprint |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 ✓ | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 3 in Internal Tools | #1 of 22 in 3D Printing |
| GitHub stars | 41 135 ✓ | 9 167 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +204 ✓ | +59 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 ✓ | 5 |
| Latest release | v2.6.0 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ | 1.11.8 · 23 Jun 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

Appsmith scores 80/100 against 73/100 for Octoprint, so it is the safer default.

Appsmith ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for Octoprint.

Appsmith is growing faster right now (+204 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Appsmith](https://selfhost.directory/project/appsmith) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/appsmith.md)
- [Octoprint](https://selfhost.directory/project/octoprint) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/octoprint.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/appsmith-vs-octoprint