# Appsmith vs LubeLogger

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Appsmith | LubeLogger |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 ✓ | 65/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 3 in Internal Tools | #2 of 5 in Vehicle Management |
| GitHub stars | 41 134 ✓ | 2 926 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +203 ✓ | +70 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 ✓ | 17 |
| Latest release | v2.6.0 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ | v1.7.4 · 14 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | JavaScript |

## Which one should you pick?

Appsmith scores 80/100 against 65/100 for LubeLogger, so it is the safer default.

Appsmith ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 17 for LubeLogger.

If you want the quickest setup, LubeLogger is easier to run; Appsmith needs more configuration.

Appsmith is growing faster right now (+203 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Appsmith](https://selfhost.directory/project/appsmith) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/appsmith.md)
- [LubeLogger](https://selfhost.directory/project/lubelogger) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/lubelogger.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/appsmith-vs-lubelogger