# apitable vs zookeeper

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | apitable | zookeeper |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 65/100 | 73/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #4 of 17 in Low Code | #1 of 8 in Configuration Management |
| GitHub stars | 15 653 ✓ | 12 827 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +36 ✓ | +17 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Java |

## Which one should you pick?

zookeeper scores 73/100 against 65/100 for apitable, so it is the safer default.

apitable is growing faster right now (+36 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [apitable](https://selfhost.directory/project/apitable) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/apitable.md)
- [zookeeper](https://selfhost.directory/project/zookeeper) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/zookeeper.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/apitable-vs-zookeeper