# apitable vs wraft

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | apitable | wraft |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 65/100 ✓ | 44/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 17 in Low Code | #35 of 46 in Document Management |
| GitHub stars | 15 654 ✓ | 167 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +35 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 3 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v0.6.7 · 25 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Elixir |

## Which one should you pick?

apitable scores 65/100 against 44/100 for wraft, so it is the safer default.

wraft ships more often: 3 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for apitable.

If you want the quickest setup, apitable is easier to run; wraft needs more configuration.

apitable is growing faster right now (+35 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [apitable](https://selfhost.directory/project/apitable) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/apitable.md)
- [wraft](https://selfhost.directory/project/wraft) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/wraft.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/apitable-vs-wraft