# apitable vs Wakupator

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | apitable | Wakupator |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 65/100 ✓ | 43/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 17 in Low Code | #11 of 22 in Home Server |
| GitHub stars | 15 653 ✓ | 184 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +36 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 1 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v1.2.0 · 6 Feb 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | C |

## Which one should you pick?

apitable scores 65/100 against 43/100 for Wakupator, so it is the safer default.

Wakupator ships more often: 1 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for apitable.

If you want the quickest setup, apitable is easier to run; Wakupator needs more configuration.

apitable is growing faster right now (+36 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [apitable](https://selfhost.directory/project/apitable) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/apitable.md)
- [Wakupator](https://selfhost.directory/project/wakupator) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/wakupator.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/apitable-vs-wakupator