# apitable vs Vintrack

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | apitable | Vintrack |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 65/100 ✓ | 49/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 17 in Low Code | #3 of 6 in Feed Aggregator |
| GitHub stars | 15 653 ✓ | 198 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +36 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 9 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v2.7.10 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

apitable scores 65/100 against 49/100 for Vintrack, so it is the safer default.

Vintrack ships more often: 9 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for apitable.

If you want the quickest setup, apitable is easier to run; Vintrack needs more configuration.

apitable is growing faster right now (+36 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [apitable](https://selfhost.directory/project/apitable) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/apitable.md)
- [Vintrack](https://selfhost.directory/project/vintrack-vinted-monitor) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/vintrack-vinted-monitor.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/apitable-vs-vintrack-vinted-monitor