# apitable vs Umami

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | apitable | Umami |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 65/100 | 85/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #4 of 17 in Low Code | #1 of 21 in Web analytics |
| GitHub stars | 15 653 | 39 753 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +36 | +772 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 13 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v3.4.1 · 23 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Umami scores 85/100 against 65/100 for apitable, so it is the safer default.

Umami ships more often: 13 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for apitable.

If you want the quickest setup, Umami is easier to run; apitable needs more configuration.

Umami is growing faster right now (+772 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [apitable](https://selfhost.directory/project/apitable) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/apitable.md)
- [Umami](https://selfhost.directory/project/umami) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/umami.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/apitable-vs-umami