# apitable vs trip2g

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | apitable | trip2g |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 65/100 ✓ | 40/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 17 in Low Code | #30 of 42 in Knowledge Management |
| GitHub stars | 15 653 ✓ | 40 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +34 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 5 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v0.12.0 · 19 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

apitable scores 65/100 against 40/100 for trip2g, so it is the safer default.

trip2g ships more often: 5 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for apitable.

apitable is growing faster right now (+34 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [apitable](https://selfhost.directory/project/apitable) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/apitable.md)
- [trip2g](https://selfhost.directory/project/trip2g) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/trip2g.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/apitable-vs-trip2g