# apitable vs Trinity

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | apitable | Trinity |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 65/100 ✓ | 57/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 17 in Low Code | #60 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 15 654 ✓ | 713 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +35 ✓ | +2 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 4 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v1.0.0 · 20 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

apitable scores 65/100 against 57/100 for Trinity, so it is the safer default.

Trinity ships more often: 4 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for apitable.

If you want the quickest setup, apitable is easier to run; Trinity needs more configuration.

apitable is growing faster right now (+35 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [apitable](https://selfhost.directory/project/apitable) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/apitable.md)
- [Trinity](https://selfhost.directory/project/trinity) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/trinity.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/apitable-vs-trinity