# apitable vs transfer.sh

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | apitable | transfer.sh |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 65/100 | 69/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #4 of 17 in Low Code | #9 of 86 in File Sharing |
| GitHub stars | 15 653 | 15 905 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +36 ✓ | +8 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

transfer.sh scores 69/100 against 65/100 for apitable, so it is the safer default.

If you want the quickest setup, transfer.sh is easier to run; apitable needs more configuration.

apitable is growing faster right now (+36 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [apitable](https://selfhost.directory/project/apitable) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/apitable.md)
- [transfer.sh](https://selfhost.directory/project/transfersh) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/transfersh.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/apitable-vs-transfersh