# apitable vs Taskwarrior

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | apitable | Taskwarrior |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 65/100 | 68/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #4 of 17 in Low Code | #2 of 15 in Productivity |
| GitHub stars | 15 653 ✓ | 6 140 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +34 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 1 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v3.5.0 · 16 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | C++ |

## Which one should you pick?

Taskwarrior scores 68/100 against 65/100 for apitable, so it is the safer default.

Taskwarrior ships more often: 1 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for apitable.

If you want the quickest setup, Taskwarrior is easier to run; apitable needs more configuration.

apitable is growing faster right now (+34 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [apitable](https://selfhost.directory/project/apitable) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/apitable.md)
- [Taskwarrior](https://selfhost.directory/project/taskwarrior) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/taskwarrior.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/apitable-vs-taskwarrior