# apitable vs Single Server

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | apitable | Single Server |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 65/100 ✓ | 44/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 17 in Low Code | #8 of 11 in Deployment |
| GitHub stars | 15 653 ✓ | 231 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +36 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 2 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v0.2.0 · 21 Jun 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

apitable scores 65/100 against 44/100 for Single Server, so it is the safer default.

Single Server ships more often: 2 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for apitable.

apitable is growing faster right now (+36 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [apitable](https://selfhost.directory/project/apitable) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/apitable.md)
- [Single Server](https://selfhost.directory/project/singleserver) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/singleserver.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/apitable-vs-singleserver