# apitable vs self-hosted-livesync-server

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | apitable | self-hosted-livesync-server |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 65/100 ✓ | 45/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 17 in Low Code | #37 of 40 in Database Management |
| GitHub stars | 15 653 ✓ | 274 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +36 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Shell |

## Which one should you pick?

apitable scores 65/100 against 45/100 for self-hosted-livesync-server, so it is the safer default.

apitable is growing faster right now (+36 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [apitable](https://selfhost.directory/project/apitable) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/apitable.md)
- [self-hosted-livesync-server](https://selfhost.directory/project/self-hosted-livesync-server) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/self-hosted-livesync-server.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/apitable-vs-self-hosted-livesync-server