# apitable vs screenlite

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | apitable | screenlite |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 65/100 ✓ | 42/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 17 in Low Code | #6 of 7 in Digital Signage |
| GitHub stars | 15 654 ✓ | 363 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +35 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

apitable scores 65/100 against 42/100 for screenlite, so it is the safer default.

apitable is growing faster right now (+35 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [apitable](https://selfhost.directory/project/apitable) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/apitable.md)
- [screenlite](https://selfhost.directory/project/screenlite) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/screenlite.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/apitable-vs-screenlite