# apitable vs scanopy

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | apitable | scanopy |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 65/100 ✓ | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 17 in Low Code | #1 of 10 in Network |
| GitHub stars | 15 653 ✓ | 5 915 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +36 | +121 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 41 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v0.19.4 · 29 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Rust |

## Which one should you pick?

apitable scores 65/100 against 64/100 for scanopy, so it is the safer default.

scanopy ships more often: 41 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for apitable.

scanopy is growing faster right now (+121 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [apitable](https://selfhost.directory/project/apitable) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/apitable.md)
- [scanopy](https://selfhost.directory/project/scanopy) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/scanopy.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/apitable-vs-scanopy