# apitable vs RustFS

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | apitable | RustFS |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 65/100 | 74/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #4 of 17 in Low Code | #1 of 5 in Storage |
| GitHub stars | 15 654 | 35 519 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +35 | +1 687 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 5 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | 1.0.4 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Rust |

## Which one should you pick?

RustFS scores 74/100 against 65/100 for apitable, so it is the safer default.

RustFS ships more often: 5 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for apitable.

If you want the quickest setup, apitable is easier to run; RustFS needs more configuration.

RustFS is growing faster right now (+1 687 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [apitable](https://selfhost.directory/project/apitable) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/apitable.md)
- [RustFS](https://selfhost.directory/project/rustfs) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/rustfs.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/apitable-vs-rustfs