# apitable vs Qinglong

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | apitable | Qinglong |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 65/100 | 69/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #4 of 17 in Low Code | #3 of 34 in Task Management |
| GitHub stars | 15 654 | 20 027 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +35 ✓ | +4 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 2 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | upgrade-master · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | JavaScript |

## Which one should you pick?

Qinglong scores 69/100 against 65/100 for apitable, so it is the safer default.

Qinglong ships more often: 2 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for apitable.

If you want the quickest setup, Qinglong is easier to run; apitable needs more configuration.

apitable is growing faster right now (+35 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [apitable](https://selfhost.directory/project/apitable) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/apitable.md)
- [Qinglong](https://selfhost.directory/project/qinglong) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/qinglong.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/apitable-vs-qinglong