# apitable vs Project OSRM

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | apitable | Project OSRM |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 65/100 | 69/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #4 of 17 in Low Code | #2 of 9 in Mapping & GPS |
| GitHub stars | 15 654 ✓ | 8 179 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +35 | +74 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 16 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v26.10.0 · 1 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | BSD-2-Clause |
| Main language | Typescript | C++ |

## Which one should you pick?

Project OSRM scores 69/100 against 65/100 for apitable, so it is the safer default.

Project OSRM ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for apitable.

If you want the quickest setup, apitable is easier to run; Project OSRM needs more configuration.

Project OSRM is growing faster right now (+74 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [apitable](https://selfhost.directory/project/apitable) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/apitable.md)
- [Project OSRM](https://selfhost.directory/project/project-osrm) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/project-osrm.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/apitable-vs-project-osrm