# apitable vs polar

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | apitable | polar |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 65/100 | 71/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #4 of 17 in Low Code | #1 of 13 in Billing |
| GitHub stars | 15 654 ✓ | 10 436 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +35 | +157 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 1 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | @polar-sh/cli@3.0.0 · 16 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

polar scores 71/100 against 65/100 for apitable, so it is the safer default.

polar ships more often: 1 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for apitable.

If you want the quickest setup, apitable is easier to run; polar needs more configuration.

polar is growing faster right now (+157 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [apitable](https://selfhost.directory/project/apitable) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/apitable.md)
- [polar](https://selfhost.directory/project/polar) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/polar.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/apitable-vs-polar