# apitable vs Pinchflat

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | apitable | Pinchflat |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 65/100 | 65/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 17 in Low Code | #13 of 142 in Media Management |
| GitHub stars | 15 654 ✓ | 5 431 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +35 | +61 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Elixir |

## Which one should you pick?

apitable and Pinchflat score the same (65/100), so the choice comes down to the details below.

If you want the quickest setup, Pinchflat is easier to run; apitable needs more configuration.

## Details

- [apitable](https://selfhost.directory/project/apitable) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/apitable.md)
- [Pinchflat](https://selfhost.directory/project/pinchflat) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/pinchflat.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/apitable-vs-pinchflat