# apitable vs OrcaQ

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | apitable | OrcaQ |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 65/100 ✓ | 49/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 17 in Low Code | #35 of 40 in Database Management |
| GitHub stars | 15 653 ✓ | 225 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +36 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 10 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v1.1.14 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

apitable scores 65/100 against 49/100 for OrcaQ, so it is the safer default.

OrcaQ ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for apitable.

If you want the quickest setup, OrcaQ is easier to run; apitable needs more configuration.

apitable is growing faster right now (+36 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [apitable](https://selfhost.directory/project/apitable) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/apitable.md)
- [OrcaQ](https://selfhost.directory/project/orca-q) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/orca-q.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/apitable-vs-orca-q