# apitable vs openstatus

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | apitable | openstatus |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 65/100 | 69/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #4 of 17 in Low Code | #1 of 7 in Status Pages |
| GitHub stars | 15 653 ✓ | 9 240 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +36 | +97 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

openstatus scores 69/100 against 65/100 for apitable, so it is the safer default.

If you want the quickest setup, apitable is easier to run; openstatus needs more configuration.

openstatus is growing faster right now (+97 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [apitable](https://selfhost.directory/project/apitable) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/apitable.md)
- [openstatus](https://selfhost.directory/project/openstatus) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/openstatus.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/apitable-vs-openstatus