# apitable vs OpenEMR

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | apitable | OpenEMR |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 65/100 | 72/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #4 of 17 in Low Code | #1 of 5 in Healthcare |
| GitHub stars | 15 654 ✓ | 5 555 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +35 | +87 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 6 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v8_5_0 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | PHP |

## Which one should you pick?

OpenEMR scores 72/100 against 65/100 for apitable, so it is the safer default.

OpenEMR ships more often: 6 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for apitable.

If you want the quickest setup, apitable is easier to run; OpenEMR needs more configuration.

OpenEMR is growing faster right now (+87 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [apitable](https://selfhost.directory/project/apitable) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/apitable.md)
- [OpenEMR](https://selfhost.directory/project/openemr) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/openemr.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/apitable-vs-openemr