# apitable vs OctoBot

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | apitable | OctoBot |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 65/100 | 69/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #4 of 17 in Low Code | #6 of 42 in Cryptocurrency |
| GitHub stars | 15 654 ✓ | 6 872 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +37 | +265 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 5 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | 2.1.1 · 30 Mar 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

OctoBot scores 69/100 against 65/100 for apitable, so it is the safer default.

OctoBot ships more often: 5 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for apitable.

OctoBot is growing faster right now (+265 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [apitable](https://selfhost.directory/project/apitable) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/apitable.md)
- [OctoBot](https://selfhost.directory/project/octobot) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/octobot.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/apitable-vs-octobot