# api200 vs OmniRoute

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | api200 | OmniRoute |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 38/100 | 88/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #32 of 39 in API Gateway | #4 of 125 in AI |
| GitHub stars | 257 | 82 242 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +3 226 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 10 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | radar-export-latest · 20 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

OmniRoute scores 88/100 against 38/100 for api200, so it is the safer default.

OmniRoute ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for api200.

If you want the quickest setup, OmniRoute is easier to run; api200 needs more configuration.

OmniRoute is growing faster right now (+3 226 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [api200](https://selfhost.directory/project/api200) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/api200.md)
- [OmniRoute](https://selfhost.directory/project/omniroute) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/omniroute.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/api200-vs-omniroute