apache-nifivsWBO
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| apache-nifi | WBO | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 72/100 | 61/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 8 in Data Pipeline | #2 of 9 in Whiteboarding |
| GitHub stars | 6 277 | 2 675 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +33 | +18 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 4 |
| Latest release | rel/nifi-2.12.0 · 13 Sept 2026 | v2.18.26 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Java | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
apache-nifi scores 72/100 against 61/100 for WBO, so it is the safer default.
WBO ships more often: 4 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for apache-nifi.
If you want the quickest setup, WBO is easier to run; apache-nifi needs more configuration.
apache-nifi details →WBO details →
Swap a project
Keep apache-nifi, compare it with
Keep WBO, compare it with