apache-nifivsSRS
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| apache-nifi | SRS | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 72/100 | 78/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 8 in Data Pipeline | #4 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 6 277 | 29 390 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +33 | +111 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 13 |
| Latest release | rel/nifi-2.12.0 · 13 Sept 2026 | v7.0-a3 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Java | C |
Which one should you pick?
SRS scores 78/100 against 72/100 for apache-nifi, so it is the safer default.
SRS ships more often: 13 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for apache-nifi.
If you want the quickest setup, SRS is easier to run; apache-nifi needs more configuration.
SRS is growing faster right now (+111 stars in 30 days).
apache-nifi details →SRS details →
Swap a project
Keep apache-nifi, compare it with
Keep SRS, compare it with