# apache-nifi vs Reactive Resume

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | apache-nifi | Reactive Resume |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 72/100 | 87/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #1 of 8 in Data Pipeline | #1 of 46 in Document Management |
| GitHub stars | 6 277 | 45 030 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +33 | +1 629 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 35 ✓ |
| Latest release | rel/nifi-2.12.0 · 13 Sept 2026 | v6.0.8 · 29 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Java | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Reactive Resume scores 87/100 against 72/100 for apache-nifi, so it is the safer default.

Reactive Resume ships more often: 35 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for apache-nifi.

If you want the quickest setup, Reactive Resume is easier to run; apache-nifi needs more configuration.

Reactive Resume is growing faster right now (+1 629 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [apache-nifi](https://selfhost.directory/project/apache-nifi) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/apache-nifi.md)
- [Reactive Resume](https://selfhost.directory/project/reactive-resume) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/reactive-resume.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/apache-nifi-vs-reactive-resume