# Apache Kafka vs Umami

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Apache Kafka | Umami |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 83/100 | 85/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #1 of 12 in Message Broker | #1 of 21 in Web analytics |
| GitHub stars | 34 152 | 39 767 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +327 | +771 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 13 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v3.4.1 · 23 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Java | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Umami scores 85/100 against 83/100 for Apache Kafka, so it is the safer default.

Umami ships more often: 13 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Apache Kafka.

If you want the quickest setup, Umami is easier to run; Apache Kafka needs more configuration.

Umami is growing faster right now (+771 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Apache Kafka](https://selfhost.directory/project/apache-kafka) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/apache-kafka.md)
- [Umami](https://selfhost.directory/project/umami) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/umami.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/apache-kafka-vs-umami