# Apache HTTP Server vs zookeeper

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Apache HTTP Server | zookeeper |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 ✓ | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 12 in Web Servers | #1 of 8 in Configuration Management |
| GitHub stars | — | 12 827 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +16 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | — | Java |

## Which one should you pick?

Apache HTTP Server scores 74/100 against 73/100 for zookeeper, so it is the safer default.

If you want the quickest setup, zookeeper is easier to run; Apache HTTP Server needs more configuration.

zookeeper is growing faster right now (+16 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Apache HTTP Server](https://selfhost.directory/project/apache-http-server) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/apache-http-server.md)
- [zookeeper](https://selfhost.directory/project/zookeeper) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/zookeeper.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/apache-http-server-vs-zookeeper