# Apache HTTP Server vs unopim

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Apache HTTP Server | unopim |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 ✓ | 69/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 12 in Web Servers | #1 of 6 in Product Management |
| GitHub stars | — | 11 045 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +46 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 17 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v3.1.3 · 29 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | — | PHP |

## Which one should you pick?

Apache HTTP Server scores 74/100 against 69/100 for unopim, so it is the safer default.

unopim ships more often: 17 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Apache HTTP Server.

If you want the quickest setup, unopim is easier to run; Apache HTTP Server needs more configuration.

unopim is growing faster right now (+46 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Apache HTTP Server](https://selfhost.directory/project/apache-http-server) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/apache-http-server.md)
- [unopim](https://selfhost.directory/project/unopim) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/unopim.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/apache-http-server-vs-unopim