Apache HTTP Servervsryot
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Apache HTTP Server | ryot | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 | 63/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 12 in Web Servers | #4 of 11 in Fitness Tracker |
| GitHub stars | — | 3 648 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +42 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 2 |
| Latest release | — | v10.5.0 · 22 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | — | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Apache HTTP Server scores 74/100 against 63/100 for ryot, so it is the safer default.
ryot ships more often: 2 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Apache HTTP Server.
If you want the quickest setup, ryot is easier to run; Apache HTTP Server needs more configuration.
ryot is growing faster right now (+42 stars in 30 days).
Apache HTTP Server details →ryot details →