Apache HTTP Servervsqm-music
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Apache HTTP Server | qm-music | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 | 51/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 12 in Web Servers | #20 of 59 in Music Streaming |
| GitHub stars | — | 589 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +1 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 11 |
| Latest release | — | v2.5.0 · 10 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | — | Java |
Which one should you pick?
Apache HTTP Server scores 74/100 against 51/100 for qm-music, so it is the safer default.
qm-music ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Apache HTTP Server.
If you want the quickest setup, qm-music is easier to run; Apache HTTP Server needs more configuration.
qm-music is growing faster right now (+1 stars in 30 days).
Apache HTTP Server details →qm-music details →