# Apache HTTP Server vs llama.cpp

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Apache HTTP Server | llama.cpp |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 | 93/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #3 of 12 in Web Servers | #2 of 25 in LLM Inference |
| GitHub stars | — | 132 689 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +3 234 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 1463 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | b11977 · 29 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | — | C++ |

## Which one should you pick?

llama.cpp scores 93/100 against 74/100 for Apache HTTP Server, so it is the safer default.

llama.cpp ships more often: 1463 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Apache HTTP Server.

If you want the quickest setup, llama.cpp is easier to run; Apache HTTP Server needs more configuration.

llama.cpp is growing faster right now (+3 234 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Apache HTTP Server](https://selfhost.directory/project/apache-http-server) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/apache-http-server.md)
- [llama.cpp](https://selfhost.directory/project/llamacpp) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/llamacpp.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/apache-http-server-vs-llamacpp