Apache HTTP Servervsllama.cpp
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Apache HTTP Server | llama.cpp | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 | 93/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 12 in Web Servers | #2 of 25 in LLM Inference |
| GitHub stars | — | 132 679 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +3 224 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 1462 |
| Latest release | — | b11976 · 29 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | — | C++ |
Which one should you pick?
llama.cpp scores 93/100 against 74/100 for Apache HTTP Server, so it is the safer default.
llama.cpp ships more often: 1462 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Apache HTTP Server.
If you want the quickest setup, llama.cpp is easier to run; Apache HTTP Server needs more configuration.
llama.cpp is growing faster right now (+3 224 stars in 30 days).
Apache HTTP Server details →llama.cpp details →